A Change to Deflection: Case Study

Boris The Blade wrote: Why change anything to Deflection?

Because that was the question I asked. If you don't want to or can't answer the question, that's fine.

Boris The Blade wrote: Maybe you should first define the problem so that people know what you are trying to do.

I never said there was a problem. You said that.

Pascal Bertrand wrote: What was the point in changing Deflection?

Sigh. It was a thought-experiment. One which people are incredibly reticent to joyfully partake in, I see.

KevinM wrote:

Pascal Bertrand wrote: What was the point in changing Deflection?

Sigh. It was a thought-experiment. One which people are incredibly reticent to joyfully partake in, I see.

OK, let me rephrase.
Of all possible changes (this includes other cards), would this one have the biggest impact?

Pascal Bertrand wrote: OK, let me rephrase. Of all possible changes (this includes other cards), would this one have the biggest impact?

Since I do not know all possible changes, I can't answer. Could you be more specific?

Maybe if the cost of deflection was X-1.... That would be more interesting. I don't think I want to see any change at this point, though.