Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
Poll: Possible fixes for Pentex Subversion
| Total number of voters: 0 | |||
| Only registered users can participate to this poll |
Maybe there's a reason putting 1/3 of your pool into one guy is considered a risk.
I could just as easily rush and aggropoke your 11 pool into the ash heap.
2 midcaps with any kind of stealth makes Pentex Subversion a waste of 2 pool. Plus, a Pentexed vamp can still cast votes, still reduce bleeds and still bounce.
I'm more worried about your 11 cap bleeding at stealth for 10 every turn.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It seems to be rarely used to lock down a rush combat deck and usually used by:
1) Bleed decks lunging at a wall
2) Wall decks lunging
3) People trying to shut down a Star Deck.
I do think that its effect is too strong and maybe it should be either that you can't act or you can't block. People seem to use it more to prevent blocking than acting, so if any editing was made I'd be tempted to make it prevent blocks and
My Blog juggernaut1981.blogspot.com/
My Dowloads Page sites.google.com/site/juggernaut1981svtesdownloads/home
Bleed like you're juggling chainsaws...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
- Posts: 2373
- Thank you received: 322
If it dominates a lot of metas, it means a lot of meta are dominated by high cap vampires and/or star vampires (because Pentex is mostly effective against those minions).johannes wrote: I wanted to stress the fact that I am not worried at all about the hoser effect of Pentex. I am worried about the fact that it seems to dominate a lot of metas. Any thoughts about that?
Removing Pentex would only strenghten that kind of decks in that case.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Ankha wrote:
If it dominates a lot of metas, it means a lot of meta are dominated by high cap vampires and/or star vampires (because Pentex is mostly effective against those minions).johannes wrote: I wanted to stress the fact that I am not worried at all about the hoser effect of Pentex. I am worried about the fact that it seems to dominate a lot of metas. Any thoughts about that?
Removing Pentex would only strenghten that kind of decks in that case.
It wouldn't strengthen those kinds of decks, it would make them equal with all the other decks that don't have easy hosers.
Some decks have easy and readily available hosers, and some do not. I like playing high-cap bruise and bleed from time to time, but Pentex radically cuts down on the number of viable decks. Putting 3 Pentexes in your deck in anticipation is just so tedious. And remember, having 3 in your deck as protection tech does NOT guarantee that you'll draw it at any point in the game! I guess the answer is to only use the decks and cards that can't be easily hosed. Let's see, where did I put those Kiasyds?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Total nonsense.AaronC wrote:
Ankha wrote:
If it dominates a lot of metas, it means a lot of meta are dominated by high cap vampires and/or star vampires (because Pentex is mostly effective against those minions).johannes wrote: I wanted to stress the fact that I am not worried at all about the hoser effect of Pentex. I am worried about the fact that it seems to dominate a lot of metas. Any thoughts about that?
Removing Pentex would only strenghten that kind of decks in that case.
It wouldn't strengthen those kinds of decks, it would make them equal with all the other decks that don't have easy hosers.
If it "make them equal", it means they are currently below "other decks"... And progressing from "below other decks" to "equal to other deck" is "making them stronger".
In either case, since they become stronger, it results in a shift (even slight) of the metagame towards high-cap vampires decks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Polling forum
- Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
Portions of the materials are the copyrights and trademarks of White Wolf Publishing AB, and are used with permission. All rights reserved. For more information please visit