Anthology set previews: April 3

self biased wrote:

BogusMagus wrote:
(2) The new vampires appear to have no group numbers. Is this so?

uh. Yes they do. They're both group 5

I must be blind.

Thanks.

Ankha wrote: You just replaced "he" by "they", not "he or she". Monçada is still a "he".

Based on the drawing, Monçada is a "it".

Lönkka wrote: God stuff; welcome changes.

Not really seeing what the usual whining is about.

Yeah

I don't have a problem with the "they", I'm only concern that it will be confusing for non native english speaking people. Even me, I had not idea that "they" could be singular.

And I'm glad that we get rid of tap/untap if that mean get rid of the WW copyright issues.
Lock/unlock seems good to me.

Boris The Blade wrote:
2) The inclusion of Wake in the rulebook is also a good step towards making the game more accessible. One should have a rough idea of how the game will play after reading the rules, and there is no way to play this game without knowing what a wake is. Next on the list: bounce.

Also next on the list: rush; environmental damage; having, using, and bearing equipment; targeting, impulse/opportunity/priority; special ability; inflicting damage; treating damage (as in treating aggravated damage as normal); side-effect damage; action fizzles; unsuccessful bleed vs unsuccessful action; moving blood; inate strike; "current" bleed/damage; in play/out of play, play effect as if a member of a clan/sect...and on and on and on.

I agree that addition of wake is great, but hopefully the rulebook will eventually be revised to include every concept in the game that is currently undefined.

but hopefully the rulebook will eventually be revised to include every concept in the game that is currently undefined.

Hopefully, more people are willing to volunteer their free to help make changes and revisions that said players need help defining.