Portions of the materials are the copyrights and trademarks of White Wolf Publishing AB, and are used with permission. All rights reserved. For more information please visit
Ropecon 2013 Saturday VTES Tournament Poll
×
Poll: Ropecon 2013 Saturday VTES Tournament Poll
| Total number of voters: 0 | |||
| Only registered users can participate to this poll |
16 May 2013 18:40 #48592
by Lönkka
NC, Finland
Replied by Lönkka on topic Ropecon 2013 Saturday VTES Tournament Poll
Guys who devised it reported after the fourth playtest that it feels like there ain't any more need of tinkering with the rules.
Different kinds of decks have been tired and an IC-votebleeder had been present in dealing agony, but it got no VPs even if it was close.
Naturally optimization is possible but isn't required. With few decks around it seems that the most VPs go to decks with plenty of combat cards (prevent+damage) and transient rushes.
A five player table yielded, before timeout, 5VP, 4VP & 2VP.
Different kinds of decks have been tired and an IC-votebleeder had been present in dealing agony, but it got no VPs even if it was close.
Naturally optimization is possible but isn't required. With few decks around it seems that the most VPs go to decks with plenty of combat cards (prevent+damage) and transient rushes.
A five player table yielded, before timeout, 5VP, 4VP & 2VP.
NC, Finland
Finnish 
Politics!
Politics!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2013 07:05 #49622
by Lönkka
NC, Finland
Replied by Lönkka on topic Ropecon 2013 Saturday VTES Tournament Poll
Looks like the draft is the preferred format...
NC, Finland
Finnish Politics!
Politics!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.096 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Polling forum
- Ropecon 2013 Saturday VTES Tournament Poll