Imbued vs Xeper
Drugo wrote: IMHO a reversal is needed... otherwise, bye bye to imbued @tournaments (at least for me).
...and good riddance.
The game is named Vampire, not Vampire Hunters. Never have I understood why the imbued and the whole set was published...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Drugo wrote: IMHO a reversal is needed... otherwise, bye bye to imbued @tournaments (at least for me).
Given that there doesn't appear to have been a spate of Imbued decks being crushed left, right and centre by the relevant vampires, why would they suddenly go bye-bye now? This isn't new. Do you also not play weenie vampires because your prey might play Durga Syn or Justine, Elder of Dallas?
Further, I'm confused as to why people's only reaction to the vampires is to look only at how to block or fail the action, when there are a variety of options to screw the relevant vampire up in advance.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
- Away
- Antediluvian
-
- Posts: 2627
- Thank you received: 868
Even further, their special rules are that far from the general play, that means "oh hi, just so you know, *I* wanted to play imbued so *you* have to memorise some more rules, which won't be relevant until *I* decide to play again with them). It's not that bad as I wrote down, but somewhere along the lines
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Drugo wrote: IMHO a reversal is needed... otherwise, bye bye to imbued @tournaments (at least for me).
Eh those vampires aren't exactly common in tournaments, I have never seen Juniper in play, Sebastian not in many years, Xeper occasionally but not that often. Thats like saying that you can't play big caps because pentex subversion exists (which is btw a lot more common card in tournaments than any of the anti-ally vampires).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
On the other hand, I'd love to see more "rock/paper/scissors" un-counterable responses like vampires (or imbued!) with passive abilities like "vampires can only play 1 freak drive per turn" or "methuselahs may play only 1 master card per turn" (just to mess with Una and Girls decks too).
ps - Pentex on a only-superior-obfuscate Baali group vampire? it will last for sure! Better be his slave and beg for 2 point while handing him the table.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Drugo wrote: On the other hand, I'd love to see more "rock/paper/scissors" un-counterable responses like vampires (or imbued!) with passive abilities like "vampires can only play 1 freak drive per turn" or "methuselahs may play only 1 master card per turn" (just to mess with Una and Girls decks too).
Err... could you clarify why a vampire who has to take actions to steal an Imbued requires an immediate reversal, but a vampire with a passive ability that screws whole deck types is to be encouraged?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
- Away
- Antediluvian
-
- Posts: 2627
- Thank you received: 868
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- Imbued vs Xeper
Portions of the materials are the copyrights and trademarks of White Wolf Publishing AB, and are used with permission. All rights reserved. For more information please visit