Portions of the materials are the copyrights and trademarks of White Wolf Publishing AB, and are used with permission. All rights reserved. For more information please visit
On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
21 Nov 2011 21:44 #15354
by Brum
It is completely fine.
Replied by Brum on topic On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
It is completely fine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2011 11:34 #15451
by elotar
We just need to ban Ashursand imbued.
NC Russia
Replied by elotar on topic On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
We just need to ban Ashurs
NC Russia
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2011 11:37 #15452
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
PRO & CON
I don't like the card because its drawback isn't a real disavantage. If one plays Liquidation, it's certain it has some recursion effects in order to take advantage of it. I've never seen a deck where Liquidation would be played without Ashur or Sudario...
This being said, the card itself isn't that wrong, it's the recursion cards that may be a trouble. It could be a 2 pool gain and be still playable.
I don't like the card because its drawback isn't a real disavantage. If one plays Liquidation, it's certain it has some recursion effects in order to take advantage of it. I've never seen a deck where Liquidation would be played without Ashur or Sudario...
This being said, the card itself isn't that wrong, it's the recursion cards that may be a trouble. It could be a 2 pool gain and be still playable.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.103 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"